HomeJournalsCorrection: ChatGPT as an Author - Elsevier

Correction: ChatGPT as an Author – Elsevier

Corrigendum on a recent article

Regarding our recent article, “Elsevier Breaks New Ground: ChatGPT Listed as a Journal Author” Published on March 19, 2023, Elsevier the leading publisher published a Corrigendum on a research article mentioned in the post.

Elsevier issues a correction regarding an earlier announcement that erroneously credited ChatGPT as an author of an academic paper. While ChatGPT is an impressive technology, its contributions to academic work are based on its programming and algorithms, which were created by a team of researchers. This article clarifies the matter and highlights the importance of crediting the human team behind ChatGPT’s development.

Corrigendum to “Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?”

Source: Corrigendum

The Corrigendum of the statement is as follows:

The first author became aware that the second listed author,
‘ChatGPT’, does not qualify for authorship according to the journal’s
guide for authors and to Elsevier’s Publishing Ethics Policies.

‘ChatGPT’ is, therefore, removed from the author list and is
acknowledged as making a substantial contribution to the writing of the
paper. After using this tool, the author reviewed and edited the content
as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.

The journal and the author would like to apologize for any incon-
convenience caused.

DOI

DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537.

Policy on the use and declaration of generative AI in the writing process

Source: Policy 

The policy explains that authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author, nor cite AI as an author. Authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.

Policy

As a leading publisher of scientific research, Elsevier takes the integrity of academic publications very seriously.

We apologize for any confusion caused by our earlier statement and hope this correction clarifies the matter.

Thank you for reading and being updated – iLovePhD

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular